� Public Whistleblower's Escrow | Main | Rize: An Hermetic Gift �

July 07, 2005

The Three Rs

Doc says it was probably some distraught French Algerian who set off the bombs in London. A combination of losing the Olympics and losing one's sense of dignity combines into the radical insanity of a mad bomber. There's a sordid joke in there somewhere, but I've come to expect that from my brother the cop, and I definitely have that sense of humor. In the end, however, this is just the thing to shush up all the fingerpointing over the Downing Street Memo. It won't however, because there are too many people who see this kind of terrorist murder as the exact same thing as British and American 'warmongering'. More's the pity.

If the occasion of this attack was not just coincidental with the opening of the G8 Summit, I think it is appropriate to suggest that some European balls are in order. That is to say since everyone seems to be concerned that we are not doing enough for Africa, perhaps they should simply decide which African country to help. In this, if they have the courage of their convictions, they out to take a cue from George W. Bush. That is to say they should prioritize their three Rs, their resources, their rationale and their resolve. Pick a country and do what you ought.

The very idea that forgiving all of Africa's debt is going to solve the host of problems those many different nations face is as absurd as the radical conviction that continually cries that Western 'underfunding' is the sole cause of African misery. The ocean of African pain cannot be boiled. You simply have to drain one swamp at a time. GWBush for better or worse had the conviction to decide where to pick his battles and decided to go after Iraq. There is no question that America will be held accountable for the success or failure of Iraq from here on out.

But who among the do-gooders on the Africa question is willing to put up their nation's reputation with such determination as their rhetoric suggests? Or is this just a payoff? I think that the EU's unwillingness to call what's going on in Sudan a genocide and put their boots on that ground demonstrates why the EU is a bad idea. There is no coalition there, it's the EU starring Great Britain, Germany, France and Belgium. In other words, it is what it always was, Western Europe.

The G8 is not an organizing body for world peace. There is no such thing. There are simply nations with leaders who are willing to step up, and there are those others who merely who pontificate and bribe.

I say today there is a new transatlantic alliance between these two great English speaking nations. We are bonded in spirit and courage. While others stand aside and allow tragedy after tragedy transpire irresponsibly, we have taken the unpopular but necessary actions. Maybe that means we in America have to take a pass on Sudan and Liberia (My pick would be Liberia, for sure). But which wealthy powerful nation has stepped forward in the past five years?

Let me take a quick moment to link to Wretchard at the Belmont Club in order to underscore that I don't expect squat from the UN.

United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan asked the United States this week to consider sending troops to Haiti to support a U.N. peacekeeping mission beset by mounting armed challenges to its authority, according to senior U.N. officials. ... He expressed hope that the United States would participate in a planned U.N. rapid reaction force, authorized by the Security Council earlier this month, that would have the firepower to intimidate armed gangs threatening the country's fragile political transition. Officials said that similar requests are being considered for other countries, including Canada and France. "We want scarier troops," one senior U.N. official said.

We already know that the UN closed down their mission in Baghdad when they were attacked. Cowards.

Is there a quote somewhere? Hmm. I'll make one up. "Cowardice is the natural disposition of those who lack resources, rationale and resolve. It is foolish to expect more from them, no matter how loudly they talk."

Posted by mbowen at July 7, 2005 11:41 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4047

Comments

Why should Europeans decide which African country to help since they divided the continent into nation states in the first place and organized the economic appropriation of resources. If you're smart enough to make a mess, you should be smart enough to clean it up - and if you can't clean it up, just forget about it - wash your hands of it...stay out, forgive the debt and tell the Africans to leave you the hell alone. now, that's a solution!!

Posted by: Temple3 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2005 05:07 PM

C'mone mane...swing the hammer...the stance of the US and UK in Iraq is not about moralizing, nor is it about oil (as you rightly stated in your recent piece), but it is about geo-politics...

Moreover, Kofi Annan is about as powerful as a Ghanaian cab driver in the realm of international politics because he cannot summon a legitimate army of soldiers or financiers to do his bidding...

why you so hard on the brother??

Posted by: Temple3 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 8, 2005 05:12 PM

I find Kofi himself to be a highly admirable man in every respect save one. He is a man in a dead end job with no chance of success. To the extent that the UN's mission is peacekeeping and nation-building, Annan and everyone else who tries will find themselves eternally frustrated and incompetent. I'm sure there are things that the UN can do well, but it's perfectly obvious that the US can do many of them better.

I would hope that the UN is reformed and adjusted to do things that it is good at doing, but I'm not convinced those things have much to do directly with handling rogue states. Now even Hatians are talking shit. That's sinking mighty low.

Posted by: Cobb [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 10, 2005 10:09 AM