|  
        Average 
          IntelligenceOf what use is 
          understanding average intelligence, especially considering that Americans 
          are so ignorant? Ek 
          Jaenicke Traces TBC's Racist RootsAll the way back 
          to Nazi supporters. This anti-integrative movement 
          with such stupid racist publications like Murray / Herrnstein's "The 
          Bell Curve", published and financed by international right wing 
          and neonazi connections...  Lane 
          Singer Debunks TBCOn several quick 
          points. Claude 
          Steele Evaluates 'Stereotype Threat'When capable black 
          college students fail to perform as well as their white counterparts, 
          the explanation often has less to do with preparation or ability than 
          with the threat of stereotypes about their capacity to succeed. Educators 
          at Stanford who tested this hypothesis report their findings and propose 
          solutions  |  Yesterday's 
        Prejudice, Today's Science
        It is not 
          enough to call Herrnstein and Murray racists because they would think 
          we have been goaded into fearing the power of their Truth. If we resist 
          their racism, then we must prove them wrong. James 
          White Debunks TBCIn 
          my continuing assault and relentless attack on "The Bell Curve" 
          and the kind of pseudo science it represents, I will go over IQ tests, 
          what they are and how they are conducted or should be conducted.  Randolph 
          T. Holhut Challenges TBCChallenging 
          the Racist Science of "The Bell Curve" Murray and Herrnstein 
          claimed that the IQs of blacks are 15 points lower than whites, a claim 
          that most of the mainstream media has treated as fact. The book's presence 
          tapped into the resurgence of overt racism in American society, and 
          helped people back up their prejudices with ``scientific'' proof. It 
          is no surprise that the Right has seized upon the book as justification 
          for abolishing welfare and other social programs to the poor. After 
          all - they say - if Latinos and blacks are genetically doomed to fail, 
          why should we give them money? ...  | 
   
    | Leon 
        Kamin of Scientific American Debunks TBC
       
        An extensive review 
          of the book. "At long last, Herrnstein and 
          Murray let it all hang out: "Affirmative action, in education and 
          the workplace alike, is leaking a poison into the American soul." 
          Having examined the American condition at the close of the 20th century, 
          these two philosopher-kings conclude, "It is time for America once 
          again to try living with inequality, as life is lived...." This 
          kind of sentiment, I imagine, is what led "New York Times" 
          columnist Bob Herbert to the conclusion that "The Bell Curve" 
          "is just a genteel way of calling somebody a nigger." Herbert 
          is right. The book has nothing to do with science." Tim 
          Beardsley of Scientific American Debunks TBCEvaluates the right 
          wing agenda of the authors. "A tendentious 
          tome abuses science to promote far-right policies". Even though 
          boosting IQ scores may be difficult and expensive, providing education 
          can help individuals in other ways. That fact, not IQ scores, is what 
          policy should be concerned with. "The Bell Curve's" fixation 
          on IQ as the best statistical predictor of a life's fortunes is a myopic 
          one. Science does not deny the benefits of a nurturing environment and 
          a helping hand. | How 
        Media Let The Bell Curve's Pseudo-Science Define the Agenda on Race
       
         Anyone 
          who flipped through the footnotes and bibliography of Murray and Herrnstein's 
          book could see that there was something screwy about their sources. 
          And there is hardly a proposition in their book that had not been thoroughly 
          debunked more than a decade ago by Steven Jay Gould's classic work on 
          the pseudo-science behind eugenics, The Mismeasure of Man.  
           
          So why 
            is The Bell Curve suddenly an "important book" that needs 
            to have cover stories, news broadcasts, even whole magazines devoted 
            to it? In large part, because the book is well-timed to take advantage 
            of a resurgence of racism in U.S. media and society--a racism that 
            does not want to face up to its own identity.  In a proposal 
            outlining the book, Murray wrote that there is "a huge number 
            of well-meaning whites who fear that they are closet racists, and 
            this book tells them they are not. It's going to make them feel better 
            about things they already think but do not know how to say." 
            (New York Times Magazine, 10/9/94) The Bell Curve does indeed tell 
            closet racists that they aren't racist, and makes them feel better 
            by saying that their prejudices are grounded in science. "    |